The August 2024 NAR settlement changed how buyer’s agent compensation is handled, and it has prompted a lot of homeowners to reconsider whether they need a listing agent at all when selling a home without an agent. The idea of selling a home without an agent is gaining traction. That’s a fair question. Here’s an honest answer.
What Actually Changed After the NAR Settlement
Before August 2024, sellers’ listing agreements typically included a commission offer to buyer’s agents, and that offer was displayed on the MLS. That practice is now prohibited — compensation can no longer be offered through the MLS when selling a home without an agent.
Many homeowners are now exploring the option of selling a home without an agent to save on commissions and maintain control over the process. Selling a home without an agent can be an empowering choice when done correctly.
In some cases, selling a home without an agent requires a solid grasp of the local market and careful planning to ensure you don’t leave money on the table.
What didn’t change: sellers can still offer buyer’s agent compensation, they just negotiate it directly in the purchase contract rather than advertising it on the MLS. In practice, most sellers in competitive markets still offer buyer’s agent compensation because it attracts more qualified buyers. The mechanics changed; the market reality hasn’t shifted dramatically.
Selling a home without an agent can also lead to potential pitfalls if you are not prepared for the challenges involved. Understanding the market dynamics is crucial for success.
The Real Financial Comparison
Considerations: When selling a home without an agent, you must be prepared to do your homework. Research pricing strategies and local market conditions.
On a $600,000 home, agent commission is a meaningful line item — one worth understanding before you decide how to proceed. Since the 2024 NAR settlement, commission structures are more openly negotiable than they’ve historically been, and rates vary. What hasn’t changed is the underlying question: what do you get for that cost, and what do you take on without it?
However, selling a home without an agent may not be suitable for everyone, especially if you lack experience in real estate transactions.
- Pricing strategy: An agent brings current MLS data, recent comp analysis, and market pattern recognition. Overpricing by even 5% costs you time and can result in a lower final sale price than if you’d priced correctly from day one.
- Marketing and MLS access: Professional photography, MLS listing, syndication to Zillow and Redfin. You can get MLS access via a flat-fee service for $300–$1,500 — this is the most important piece if you go the self-represented route.
- Showings and negotiation: You handle all inquiries, schedule all showings, respond to all offers, and negotiate without a professional advocate.
- Contract and legal exposure: In Massachusetts, both parties use attorneys at closing, which provides some protection. But the offer, counteroffer, and contingency negotiation is your responsibility until you’re under contract.
What the Data Says About Selling Without an Agent
The price gap between self-represented sales and agent-assisted sales is significant and consistent. According to the National Association of Realtors’ 2023 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, the median sale price for sellers who represented themselves was $310,000, compared to $405,000 for agent-assisted sales. Even accounting for the fact that self-represented sales skew toward lower price points and rural markets, the gap is hard to ignore when you’re doing the math on your own transaction.
Commission savings look different when the sale price itself is lower.
Many sellers have found that selling a home without an agent is a daunting task, often leading them to reconsider their options. When it comes to negotiating, selling a home without an agent can be tricky, as the lack of professional representation can make a difference.
Many sellers find that selling a home without an agent can yield great results, provided they are prepared and informed throughout the process. However, it’s also worth noting that selling without an agent rarely plays out the way sellers expect. NAR data shows that roughly 90% of sellers who start the process without representation end up hiring an agent before the transaction closes. The most commonly cited reasons: difficulty with pricing, lack of qualified buyer interest, and the complexity of negotiating and managing the contract process without professional support.
Where Selling Without an Agent Works Best
Going without an agent tends to perform well when you already have a buyer — a neighbor, family friend, or coworker — so MLS exposure isn’t the variable. It also works in your favor when you’re in a market where homes are moving quickly regardless, when you have real transaction experience, and when you have the time and availability to manage showings, follow-up, and negotiations yourself.
It tends to underperform when you’re unfamiliar with pricing strategy, when your situation has complexity — estate sale, divorce, rental conversion, unpermitted work — or when you simply can’t be available and responsive throughout the process. Buyers and their agents notice when a self-represented seller is slow to respond or uncertain in negotiation.
In conclusion, selling a home without an agent can be rewarding if you approach it with the right mindset and preparation. The journey of selling a home without an agent is not for the faint of heart.
The Middle Ground: Flat-Fee MLS
Ultimately, the decision of whether to go through selling a home without an agent rests on your unique circumstances and comfort level with the process.
Flat-fee MLS services let you pay a one-time fee, typically $300–$1,500, to get your home listed on the MLS and syndicated to Zillow and Redfin. You handle everything else. This captures the single most valuable piece of what an agent provides — market exposure — without full representation.
Some brokerages now offer à la carte services: pay only for a pricing consultation, a contract review, or negotiation support at a specific stage. These hybrid models have expanded since the NAR settlement and are worth exploring if you want professional support without full representation.
In practice, the overwhelming majority of sellers in Southern NH and Northern MA still work with listing agents. The combination of time savings, pricing accuracy, negotiation expertise, and MLS reach continues to justify the cost for most sellers — especially when the data on self-represented sale prices is part of the conversation.
See the Numbers for Yourself
Whatever path you choose, start by knowing your estimated net. That’s the number that matters.
Ready to take the next step?
